TL;DR

Querétaro is the fastest-growing wholesale market in Latin America, about 298 MW and up roughly 450% in a year, with most of Mexico's racks in the state. CloudHQ's $4.8B campus only changes the category if 200 MW energizes in 2027. Kio has a $1.3B QRO3 option. CFE and water are the constraints. Plan México wants $100B a year of FDI against a 2025 print of $40.9B, about 39% of it American. Price the power contract and the interconnection.

I live in this market, so CBRE's Q1 2026 print was confirmation more than surprise. Wholesale inventory in Querétaro reached 298.2 MW, up 450% year on year, with vacancy around 10.6%. Depending on the source, the state now holds 65% to 79% of Mexico's installed data-center capacity, tighter than Northern Virginia's share of the U.S. base. The work from here is mapping who is live, who is still a rendering, and whether Plan México's energy numbers can keep up with U.S. checks.

Key Takeaways
  • Capacity already serving tenants is still a mix: Kio on the Mexican colo side, ODATA / Aligned, Ascenty, and Equinix on the U.S.-owned wholesale and interconnection side. The announcements are hyperscale campuses.
  • CloudHQ is the project that would change the state's category: $4.8B, six halls, 52 hectares, 200 MW targeted for 2027, 900 MW at full build, waterless cooling, a private substation, and a 2 GW switching station with CFE and Cenace.
  • Microsoft ran gas generators waiting on CFE high-voltage into 2027. Recent CFE work for AWS and ODATA is measured in single- and double-digit MW. That is the real scale of the grid today.
  • Plan México wants $100B of FDI a year. 2025 printed $40.9B, $15.9B (38.8%) of it American. The energy line is about $23.4B and +22 GW of generation by 2030.

Who is actually here

There are two books. One is capacity that already serves cloud and enterprise tenants. The other is campus AI load that only exists if CFE, Cenace, or a private substation hits the date on the lease.

PlayerTypeQuerétaro / Bajío footprintScale signal
CloudHQU.S. wholesale hyperscale6-building, 52-ha campus$4.8B; 200 MW (2027); 900 MW full
KIO (I Squared)Mexican colocation / interconnectionQRO2 live; QRO3 in El MarquésUp to $1.3B / ~100 MW by 2030; $200M+ in 2026 (CDMX, MTY, QRO)
ODATA (Aligned)U.S.-owned wholesaleQR03 campus; QR04 near San Miguel>40% of Mexico operational IT power; QR03 first phase 72 MW
AWSHyperscalerMexico region, 3 AZs$5B over 15 years
Microsoft AzureHyperscalerMexico CentralGrid energize targeted 2027; interim gas generation
EquinixInterconnectionMX1 / MX2Carrier-neutral; Dallas / Miami fiber
Ascenty / Scala / Layer 9Wholesale / hyperscaleQRO and Guanajuato~52 MW Ascenty pair; Scala campuses; Layer 9 ~96 MW
Google / Oracle / Huawei / AlibabaCloud regionsQRO / MexicoFollow-the-workload capacity

ODATA is the quiet incumbent, more than 40% of Mexico's operational IT power, mostly in Querétaro, with QR04 stretching toward Guanajuato. Kio is the Mexican operator: I Squared since 2022, more than $900 million invested, QRO2 live, a "Hecho en México" mark this year from Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard. Equinix is not in the megawatt race. MX1 and MX2 are the interconnection hotels to Infomart Dallas and NAP of the Americas in Miami, which is how a Bajío rack joins a North American network. Also on the board, at smaller scale: Triara (Telmex), Nabiax, HostDime, MTP, EdgeConneX, MDC, Fermaca, Cybolt, Neutral DC.

CloudHQ is the change in scale. First 200 MW secured, energy works started in January 2025 and aimed at the second half of 2027, about $250 million of pre-development capex, 7,200 construction jobs and roughly 1,000 permanent roles. Waterless cooling matters here. Querétaro is in structural water stress. Evaporative design in this corridor is a water bet dressed up as a cooling spec.

Plan México, electricity first

Sheinbaum presented Plan México on January 13, 2025. The headline is $100 billion of FDI a year for six years, with nearshoring as the method. Data centers showed up on the first-month project list with semiconductors, drones, and a Mexican satellite. The Bajío is one of the poles. The tax side is accelerated depreciation, and in the Polos de Desarrollo a 100% immediate deduction on new fixed assets.

Electricity will decide whether those poles fill. About $23.4 billion is earmarked ($12.3B generation, $7.5B transmission, $3.6B distribution), with a target of 22,000 MW of new generation by 2030 and a first batch of 100 transmission upgrades. CFE is supposed to keep majority participation. Private plants can get built; interconnection still goes through CFE and Cenace. CloudHQ's private substation and 2 GW switching station are being done with the state, which is the only way a 900 MW campus is even discussable. Microsoft's Mexico Central site ran seven gas generators while it waited for high-voltage energization, currently aimed at Q2 2027.

CFE has connected some real, small loads: 2 MW for AWS and 6 MW for Abbott at Finsa Querétaro, 18.8 MW for ODATA at VYMSA. Those connections are useful. They are also nowhere near a 200 MW first phase. Transmission and on-site private power have to move on the same calendar or the campus numbers stay on slides.

The U.S. and Mexico numbers

Mexico's 2025 FDI was a record $40.87 billion, up 10.8%. The United States sent $15.88 billion, 38.8% of the total, then Spain ($4.43B), Canada ($3.32B), the Netherlands, and Japan. New investment rose about 133% to $7.38 billion. Most of the stock is still reinvested earnings. Q1 2026 was another record at $23.59 billion, $10.21 billion of it American. Ebrard named data centers, AI, and electronics in the central region among the associated projects. The $100B annual target in Plan México is a political number sitting on a $41B base. U.S. boards still decide a large share of whether it moves.

The U.S. still holds about 40% of global data-center capacity. Census figures released August 3 put private U.S. data-center construction at about $68 billion annualized in June, up roughly 46% year on year. Hyperscaler AI capex is a $700B-plus 2026 item. Mexico's live megawatts are small next to that. What Mexico has is land, latency into Texas and the southern U.S., labor, and USMCA cover for digital trade. Queues and local opposition bind the U.S. side. CFE, Cenace, and water bind this side.

A CloudHQ campus announced with Sheinbaum, Ebrard, and Governor Kuri is American private capital, Mexican land, and Mexican electrons serving North American cloud load. Equinix's path through Dallas and Miami is the same structure at the network layer. AWS's $5 billion, 15-year Mexico region is the same structure at the product layer. USMCA is the legal cover. The 2026 review is the political risk. If Washington treats Mexican digital infrastructure as an extension of U.S. compute, both countries take a piece of the capex cycle. If it treats the corridor as leakage, projects wait on substations.

If you are diligencing a site or a vendor, the split is practical. CloudHQ, Scala, Layer 9, and Kio QRO3 are the construction book. ODATA and Ascenty hold wholesale IT. Equinix and Kio hold interconnection. AWS, Microsoft, Google, and Oracle are the offtake. CFE, Cenace, and private substations are the grid. I Squared, Digital Realty, DigitalBridge, Brookfield, and Aligned sit behind the platforms. The questions that actually move value are offtake versus energization dates, cooling versus water, and whether a 900 MW announcement is a 200 MW 2027 fact.

My View on This

Start with contracted, energized megawatts. CloudHQ changes the state's category only if the 2 GW switchyard is real. Kio is the operator you want in the room when a Mexican flag and an interconnection contract both matter. ODATA is what is already running. Equinix is how traffic leaves Querétaro without leaving the North American network. Plan México will not print $100 billion of FDI because a decree says so. It will print more data-center MW if CFE transmission and private generation share a calendar. U.S. and Mexican operators are already in one power-and-compute market with two regulators. Price the interconnection and the power contract. The ribbon-cutting is not the asset.

Sources